Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Rising Food Prices

The recent months saw an unprecedented increase in food prices. The price of rice, the most common staple in the world, soared by 141% since the beginning of the year, while other staples such as wheat and corn experienced similar price increases as well. How did this sudden spike in prices occur, if there weren’t any natural disaster (except the recent Cyclone Nargis, which happened after the price increase), nor any major crisis that threatened world food supply? This didn’t happen without rhyme or reason. In fact, we believe that a multitude of supply and demand factors, both short-term and long-term, have contributed towards the recent food price increases. An article that gives a clear overview of the current situation of food shortages is attached below, along with our own economic analysis of the issues raised.


Causes behind the price hike:

“Freak weather is a factor. But so are dramatic changes in the global economy, including higher oil prices, lower food reserves and growing consumer demand in China and India.”


The growing appetite of China’s and India’s consumers, following years of rapid economic growth resulting in greater purchasing power, has been frequently cited as the main reason behind the recent food price increases. These consumers are increasingly switching from basic staples such as rice to more luxurious ones such as meat and dairy products. The production of 1kg of beef, for instance, requires much more than 1kg of grain since livestock also need to consume food in order to provide us with their meat. This is known as derived demand, where the demand for grain increases as a result of an increase in demand for meat, eventually leading to higher grain prices.


“Among the driving forces are petroleum prices, which increase the cost of everything from fertilizers to transport to food processing.”


While seemingly unrelated, the increase in oil prices also has a profound impact on food prices. First and foremost, oil constitutes an important component for the production of fertilizers and also the transportation of agricultural products. An increase in oil prices causes the cost of agricultural production and transportation to increase, shifting the supply curve to the left. Also, as a result of higher oil prices, biofuel development projects in many countries are also picking up. Converting more food into fuel further aggravate the situation by decreasing the already-limited food supply.


“But attempts to control prices in one country often have dire effects elsewhere. China's restrictions on wheat flour exports resulted in a price spike in Indonesia this year, according to the FAO. Ukraine and Russia imposed export restrictions on wheat, causing tight supplies and higher prices for importing countries.”


To make matters worse, many governments and organisations adopt economic policies based on self-interest. Grain-exporting countries have already begun to cut exports in order to keep local prices low, while grain-importing countries began hoarding supplies, fearing higher prices and more limited supply in the future. Panic-buying by consumers, as well as speculators expecting prices to rise in the future, causes the demand for grain products to increase tremendously in the short-term. As a result, prices continue to rise at an unprecedented pace.


“The world's poorest nations still harbor the greatest hunger risk. Clashes over bread in Egypt killed at least two people last week, and similar food riots broke out in Burkina Faso and Cameroon this month.”


Most directly-hit are the ones who earn low wages, who are usually the ones to spend the largest proportion of income on foodstuffs. Already, many places in the world have seen strikes and clashes, sometimes fatal, as a result of rising food prices. Since basic staples such as rice, wheat and corn are also basic ingredients for many bakery and noodle products, increase in grain prices causes an almost universal increase in food prices (as seen in the article, even the price of escargot was not spared). In Singapore, import price-push inflation was experienced as a result of that.


Policy options: Free market or government intervention?

“In decades past, farm subsidies and support programs allowed major grain exporting countries to hold large surpluses, which could be tapped during food shortages to keep prices down. But new trade policies have made agricultural production much more responsive to market demands -- putting global food reserves at their lowest in a quarter century.Without reserves, bad weather and poor harvests have a bigger impact on prices.”


Many economists have argued that the best long-term solution to global food shortages is to allow the free market to take its course – allow prices to rise so that farmers will have more incentives to produce more. However, problems might arise if the free market is left on its own. Food, as a basic survival necessity, cannot be allowed to have its price rise too rapidly, as survival of the poor might be threatened. Furthermore, the supply of grain is price inelastic, as the quantity of grain supplied cannot increase overnight following an increase in prices, since farmers also need to take time before their output can meet market demand. These problems seem to point towards the argument that food, as a basic necessity, should be “spared” from the mechanisms of the free market and governments should heavily intervene with the supply and demand for food.


“Economists say that for the short term, government bailouts will have to be part of the answer to keep unrest at a minimum.”


However, long-term, heavy intervention should not be main focus of the government. The recent food scare represents a breakdown of the mechanisms of food supply and demand after years of government intervention. Huge government subsidies on food, coupled with the lack of investments in recent years to boost agricultural productivity, have created a chronic food shortage that hasn’t been discovered until recently. The role of the government, therefore, should be on cushioning the impacts of such price increases. In the short run, governments can choose to adopt a combination of food subsidies and direct financial aid to the poor to ensure their survival. In the long run, however, more things need to be done.


“In the long term, prices are expected to stabilize. Farmers will grow more grain for both fuel and food and eventually bring prices down.”


Firstly, agricultural productivity should be increased by providing farmers with more incentives for increased production (via price increases, gradually). There should also be more investments in developing higher-yield, more pest-resistant grain types. Introducing new technologies to traditional farms in less-developed countries also helps to increase agricultural productivity. The main emphasis of such development projects should be on the least-developed farms in the world since that would yield the greatest returns since the law of diminishing returns has not set in. To quote from the Economist, “it would be easier to boost grain yields in Africa from two tonnes per hectare to four than it would be to raise yields in Europe from eight tonnes to ten”.

Concluding remarks:

The use of short-term price controls, subsidies and exchange rate policies (in the case of Singapore) to cushion the impact of rising food prices, coupled with long-term supply-side policies of increasing agricultural productivity, will hopefully lead to a more painless transition to a new market equilibrium. Let’s all hope that Thomas Malthus was wrong.


ARTICLE
Taken from http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/24/food.ap/index.html
MEXICO CITY, Mexico (AP) -- If you're seeing your grocery bill go up, you're not alone.
Protesters share a loaf of bread in Cairo, Egypt, while demonstrating against high food prices.
From subsistence farmers eating rice in Ecuador to gourmets feasting on escargot in France, consumers worldwide face rising food prices in what analysts call a perfect storm of conditions. Freak weather is a factor. But so are dramatic changes in the global economy, including higher oil prices, lower food reserves and growing consumer demand in China and India.


The world's poorest nations still harbor the greatest hunger risk. Clashes over bread in Egypt killed at least two people last week, and similar food riots broke out in Burkina Faso and Cameroon this month.


But food protests now crop up even in Italy. And while the price of spaghetti has doubled in Haiti, the cost of miso is packing a hit in Japan.


"It's not likely that prices will go back to as low as we're used to," said Abdolreza Abbassian, economist and secretary of the Intergovernmental Group for Grains for the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization. "Currently if you're in Haiti, unless the government is subsidizing consumers, consumers have no choice but to cut consumption. It's a very brutal scenario, but that's what it is."


No one knows that better than Eugene Thermilon, 30, a Haitian day laborer who can no longer afford pasta to feed his wife and four children since the price nearly doubled to $0.57 a bag. Their only meal on a recent day was two cans of corn grits.


"Their stomachs were not even full," Thermilon said, walking toward his pink concrete house on the precipice of a garbage-filled ravine. By noon the next day, he still had nothing to feed them for dinner.


Their hunger has had a ripple effect. Haitian food vendor Fabiola Duran Estime, 31, has lost so many customers like Thermilon that she had to pull her daughter, Fyva, out of kindergarten because she can't afford the $20 monthly tuition.


Fyva was just beginning to read.


In the long term, prices are expected to stabilize. Farmers will grow more grain for both fuel and food and eventually bring prices down. Already this is happening with wheat, with more crops to be planted in the U.S., Canada and Europe in the coming year.


However, consumers still face at least 10 years of more expensive food, according to preliminary FAO projections.


Among the driving forces are petroleum prices, which increase the cost of everything from fertilizers to transport to food processing. Rising demand for meat and dairy in rapidly developing countries such as China and India is sending up the cost of grain, used for cattle feed, as is the demand for raw materials to make biofuels.


What's rare is that the spikes are hitting all major foods in most countries at once. Food prices rose 4 percent in the U.S. last year, the highest rise since 1990, and are expected to climb as much again this year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.


As of December, 37 countries faced food crises, and 20 had imposed some sort of food-price controls.


For many, it's a disaster. The U.N.'s World Food Program says it's facing a $500 million shortfall in funding this year to feed 89 million needy people. On Monday, it appealed to donor countries to step up contributions, saying its efforts otherwise have to be scaled back.


In Egypt, where bread is up 35 percent and cooking oil 26 percent, the government recently proposed ending food subsidies and replacing them with cash payouts to the needy. But the plan was put on hold after it sparked public uproar.


"A revolution of the hungry is in the offing," said Mohammed el-Askalani of Citizens Against the High Cost of Living, a protest group established to lobby against ending the subsidies.
In China, the price hikes are both a burden and a boon.


Per capita meat consumption has increased 150 percent since 1980, so Zhou Jian decided six months ago to switch from selling auto parts to pork. The price of pork has jumped 58 percent in the past year, yet every morning housewives and domestics still crowd his Shanghai shop, and more customers order choice cuts.


The 26-year-old now earns $4,200 a month, two to three times what he made selling car parts. And it's not just pork. Beef is becoming a weekly indulgence.


"The Chinese middle class is starting to change the traditional thought process of beef as a luxury," said Kevin Timberlake, who manages the U.S.-based Western Cattle Company feedlot in China's Inner Mongolia.


At the same time, increased cost of food staples in China threatens to wreak havoc. Beijing has been selling grain from its reserves to hold down prices, said Jing Ulrich, chairwoman of China equities for JP Morgan.


"But this is not really solving the root cause of the problem," Ulrich said. "The cause of the problem is a supply-demand imbalance. Demand is very strong. Supply is constrained. It is as simple as that."


Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao says fighting inflation from shortages of key foods is a top economic priority. Inflation reached 7.1 percent in January, the highest in 11 years, led by an 18.2 percent jump in food prices.


Meanwhile, record oil prices have boosted the cost of fertilizer and freight for bulk commodities -- up 80 percent in 2007 over 2006. The oil spike has also turned up the pressure for countries to switch to biofuels, which the FAO says will drive up the cost of corn, sugar and soybeans "for many more years to come."


In Japan, the ethanol boom is hitting the country in mayonnaise and miso, two important culinary ingredients, as biofuels production pushes up the price of cooking oil and soybeans.
A two-pound bottle of mayonnaise has risen about 10 percent in two months to as much as 330 yen (nearly $3), said Daishi Inoue, a cook at a Chinese restaurant.


"It's not hurting us much now," he said. "But if prices keep going up, we have no choice but to raise our prices."


Miso Bank, a restaurant in Tokyo's glitzy Ginza district, specializes in food cooked with miso, or soybean paste.


"We expect prices to go up in April all at once," said Miso Bank manager Koichi Oritani. "The hikes would affect our menu. So we plan to order miso in bulk and make changes to the menu."


Italians are feeling the pinch in pasta, with consumer groups staging a one-day strike in September against a food deeply intertwined with national identity. Italians eat an estimated 60 pounds of pasta per capita a year.


The protest was symbolic because Italians typically stock up on pasta, buying multiple packages at a time. But in the next two months pasta consumption dropped 5 percent, said farm lobbyist Rolando Manfredini.


"The situation has gotten even worse," he said.


In decades past, farm subsidies and support programs allowed major grain exporting countries to hold large surpluses, which could be tapped during food shortages to keep prices down. But new trade policies have made agricultural production much more responsive to market demands -- putting global food reserves at their lowest in a quarter century.


Without reserves, bad weather and poor harvests have a bigger impact on prices.


"The market is extremely nervous. With the slightest news about bad weather, the market reacts," said economist Abbassian.


That means that a drought in Australia and flooding in Argentina, two of the world's largest suppliers of industrial milk and butter, sent the price of butter in France soaring 37 percent from 2006 to 2007.


Forty percent of escargot, the snail dish, is butter.


"You can do the calculation yourself," said Romain Chapron, president of Croque Bourgogne, which supplies escargot. "It had a considerable effect. It forced people in our profession to tighten their belts to the maximum."


The same climate crises sparked a 21 percent rise in the cost of milk, which with butter makes another famous French food item -- the croissant. Panavi, a pastry and bread supplier, has raised retail prices of croissants and pain au chocolat by 6 to 15 percent.


Already, there's a lot of suspicion among consumers.


"They don't understand why prices have gone up like this," said Nicole Watelet, general secretary at the Federation of French Bakeries and Pastry Enterprises. "They think that someone is profiting from this. But it's not us. We're paying." Food costs worldwide spiked 23 percent from 2006 to 2007, according to the FAO. Grains went up 42 percent, oils 50 percent and dairy 80 percent.


Economists say that for the short term, government bailouts will have to be part of the answer to keep unrest at a minimum. In recent weeks, rising food prices sparked riots in the West African nations of Burkina Faso, where mobs torched buildings, and Cameroon, where at least four people died.


But attempts to control prices in one country often have dire effects elsewhere. China's restrictions on wheat flour exports resulted in a price spike in Indonesia this year, according to the FAO. Ukraine and Russia imposed export restrictions on wheat, causing tight supplies and higher prices for importing countries. Partly because of the cost of imported wheat, Peru's military has begun eating bread made from potato flour, a native crop.


"We need a response on a large scale, either the regional or international level," said Brian Halweil of the environmental research organization Worldwatch Institute. "All countries are tied enough to the world food markets that this is a global crisis."


Poorer countries can speed up the adjustment by investing in agriculture, experts say. If they do, farmers can turn high prices into an engine for growth.


But in countries like Burkina Faso, the crisis is immediate.


Days after the riots, Pascaline OuÄedraogo wandered the market in the capital, Ouagadougou, looking to buy meat and vegetables. She said a good meal cost 1,000 francs (about $2.35) not long ago. Now she needs twice that.


"The more prices go up, the less there is to meet their needs," she said of her three children, all in secondary school. "You wonder if it's the government or the businesses that are behind the price hikes."


IrÇene Belem, a 25-year-old with twins, struggles to buy milk, which has gone up 57 percent in recent weeks.


"We knew we were poor before," she said, "but now it's worse than poverty."

Kok Wei
Li Hui
Wei Zheng
07S6E

7:03 AM   (0 comments)



Thursday, May 8, 2008
Benefits of Trade for Singapore
I picked up a handwritten piece of paper and realized that it was about international trade, our latest topic. The heading was "The Benefits of Trade for Singapore". Here is a verbatim copy of the paper. I claim no credit for the contents below. 

1. Wider Consumer Choice and Greater Variety --> Higher Standard of Living
With trade, consumers all over the world are able to enjoy a greater variety of goods and services to suit different tastes. The advent of trade has allowed temperate fruits such as apples to be consumed and enjoyed in Singapore. This would not be possible otherwise as Singapore has a tropical climate that is not conducive for growing such fruits.

2. Efficiency in Production and Lower World Prices
Specialization allows firms to increase the market size for their products by moving beyond domestic markets into international markets. This allows firms to reap economies of scale. Disk drives manufacturer has a high MES, so it must spread its high startup cost over a large quantity so that the unit cost of disks is affordable. With trade, disk drive makers in Singapore can move meeting domestic demand into meeting world demand. In fact, SIngapore produced 70% of the world's disk drives in 2006. Thus, trade, by furthering the quantity produced, allows the manufacturer to experience EOS and spread the savings to consumers. 

3. Factor Price Equalisation
This theory states that the relative prices for two identical factors of production will eventually equal each other due to competition. An example is bread that is produced in Malaysia (Bonjour Bread) versus those made in Singapore (Sunshine Bread). Both are sold in the domestic market. Currently Bonjour bread is cheaper. The prices of bread are predicted to approach the same price in the long run due to competition. Factor price equilibrium states that the wages of workers will also be similar as a result. The consequence is that free trade will equalize wages throughout the world, thus Singapore is trying to manufacture high-end products and move up the value chain so that factory workers here will not experience a drop in wages from the competition by China/India. Do note that the decrease in wages is not caused by migration of workers, but from the free trade of cheaper goods from China/India.

4. Increased Competition and Prevention of Monopolies
By bringing more producers to the market, international trade increases competition and promotes economic efficiency. One example is the bidding of the Integrated Resorts by various consortiums led by overseas entertainment corporations eg Genting. The alternative is to commission an existing statutory board ( eg Sentosa Development Corporation, which has managed Sentosa from 1972) to design and manage, but this will decrease competition. The bidding process is believed to increase the competition of ideas and the consortium will add another company involved in the tourism industry here.

5. Innovation and Transfer of Technologies
Fierce competition stimulates entrepreneurial efforts to improve products. International trade also provides new markets. An example is the Singapore-Suzhou Industrial Park. Engineers from the JTC and consultants from EDB are roped in to set up the industrial park, leading to growth in Suzhou and also the transfer of advanced technologies from SIngapore. The collaboration also provide new markets for JTC, which profits economically from the construction of the industrial park.

6. Trade as an engine of growth
Free trade provides greater access to global markets for the products of domestic producers. The demand for a country's exports are likely to grow, especially if exports have a high income elasticity of demand. Singapore has signed various Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with trade partners such as USA and Middle East. Singapore, as a major trading centre and the busiest trading port in the world, also benefits from the side effects of trade such as docking fees and ship refueling fees.

7. Non-economic advantage
There was nothing mentioned under this heading.

Please, may the original author please write a comment to claim your work. I remember the first page of the manuscript was shown in LT4 on Tuesday. 

Thanks. ~ Anonymous
9:00 AM   (1 comments)



Wednesday, May 7, 2008
The art of interpreting essay question requirements
Dear Econs C2 students,

I want to pose a question to all of you. Suppose an essay question is worded as follows:

Explain how fiscal and monetary policy can be used to influence national income. (12 marks)

By now, all of you should have a clear idea how to structure your answer to the above question. Now, suppose the wording of the question is altered slightly to:

Explain how fiscal and monetary policy can be used to influence the circular flow of income. (12 marks)

How many of you will basically give the same answer for the second question as you would have given for the first one? For your information, the second question actually came out for the A level H1 Nov 2007 exam.

Interested students may discuss with their tutors how a simple alteration may lead to a slightly different essay focus and how important it is to answer the question as it is worded, rather than giving memorized answers. For my classes, it of course will be complusory to discuss this during tutorials.

Regards,
Mr Tan
10:01 PM   (0 comments)



Deep Recession Fears Forced Fed to Cut Rates
The following is an article I have found in My Paper, Thursday, April 10, 2008, Page A15 under the "My Money" section. I feel that this is extremely relevant especially to the recently covered topic in Economics on Interest Rates and Monetary Policy, and it involves a number of macro-economic concepts taught in Year 2. Also, I'm glad to find the concepts directly applicable to a real life example.

In this article, the Federal Reserve (central bank in the US) policymakers are adopting an expansionary monetary policy due to worries about a deep recession in the economy. This recession, from my understanding of the article, is caused mainly by a fall in the AD curve, thus slowing economic growth in terms of Real GDP. The solution adopted was to cut its most important interest rate by three quarters of a percentage point to 2.25 percent and to pump more liquidity into the global financial system.

In this post, I will try to apply as many economic concepts as possible to the issues (especially liquidity ones) mentioned in the article as well as to give my own views.

Important points are underlined.

Photobucket

Background Information - Sub-prime Mortgage Crisis
Before going into that, the sub-prime mortgage crisis (underlined in blue) is mentioned as well and it is related to the fall in house rates and a credit slump (credit crunch) that was mentioned. This was due to adjustable rate mortgages made to higher-risk borrowers with lower income or lesser credit history than "prime" borrowers. Also, loan incentives and a long-term trend of rising housing prices encouraged borrowers to assume mortgages, believing they would be able to refinance at more favorable terms later.

From the article, "further restriction of credit availability and ongoing weakness in the housing market."

This problem accelerated in late 2006 and triggered the global financial crisis due to a drop in the prices of houses in 206-207 in many parts of ths US, thus making refinancing more difficult. This declination of the value of mortgage assets led to the unwillingness of the borrowers to make payments and incurred huge losses, thus causing lenders to reduce lending activity and leading to the credit crunch or to make loans at higher interest rates. In turn, fewer or more expensive loans decrease investment by businesses and consumer spending and it puts a downward pressure on the economy.

Expansionary Monetary Policy
As mentioned above, this policy has been adopted in that the interest rate has been cut. Also, from the last three paragraphs, we can see that the government is regulating (increasing) the credit demand and supply through Open Market Operations as well. This is made possible by "making as much as US$200 billion worth of Treasuries available". This simply implies that the government is lending Treasury securities by purchasing government securities. This can also serve to increase the liquidity ratio for banks and to increase their credit creating ability, thus increasing the money supply in the economy.

Although increasing the Money Supply can increase consumption directly as well through the direct mechanism, the policy was targeted mainly at increasing investments (indirectly) made by the firms by encouraging more lending and borrowing and hence more funds for worthy borrowers (investment firms). This serves to decrease the downward pressure on the economic growth by stimulating AD.

Setbacks - Inflation
However, as mentioned in the article, the two 'dissents' favoured a smaller cut in interest rates for fear of inflation. This is refering to demand pull inflation, i.e. if the huge cut in the interest rate lead to an excessive rise in AD curve much more than the AS curve in general. Here the article addresses the second problem that the US economy is facing and that the policymakers should take this into account as well, i.e. "soaring energy prices and high food costs."

The writer also mentions about inflation expectations and that people 'will act in ways that will make inflation worse.' This refers to the fact that consumers and firms will bring their anticipated consumption forward and that trade unions may start to demand for higher wages, leading to a rise in production costs and a decrease in the AS and an even higher increase in AD (wage-price spiral). These increases prices without really increasing Real GDP/ Income.

I feel that the pressure on inflation could be lessen if supply side policies were used as well. For example, competition could be encouraged, thus firms would need to cut production costs. This would serve to shift the LRAS to the right and to upkeep the shift in AD curve and hence to reduce the potential inflation.
Also, temporary price controls could be used (though risky) to reduce expectations, once the inflation rate is stabilised, they can be removed.

However, we can also see that there is an interplay of the expansionary monetary policy and supply-side policy in that encouraging investments wil not oly boost AD in the short run to counter recession, but also increases the productive capacity of the economy, causing LRAS to shift to the right.

Towards the end, it is also mentioned in the article that economists expect the Fed to lower interest rates in view of the faltering employment market and hence another problem in the US economy is identified. This (stimulating AD) will thus serve to reduce cyclical unemployment, which is caused by a lack of AD.

I find that by reading articles which we've actually found on our own, instead of only reading the examples in the notes and case studies in tutorials, we can further convince ourselves (and others) that what we learn in Economics, especially on macro, is indeed useful and applicable. The article above mentions about the recession, the central bank, monetary policy and the steps used in it to regulate money supply, and also inflation. Such concepts would be boring if we only learn it in theory without applying it to real life scenarios.

Furthermore, there is a sense of achievement when I find that I can understand what most parts of the article is addressing. For example, terms like 'Treasury securities' and 'restriction of credit availability' would have sounded totally unfamilar to me if I have not taken Economics. Also, I wouldn't have realised what the writer is talking about when mentioning that 'people will act in ways to make inflation worst' and that 'the Fed said it would make as much as US$200 billion worth of Treasuries available.' I must again say that I am glad to find an article in which the concepts we learn in a recent topic is directly applicable to a real economy. This serves as a means to consolidate my learning as well.

Damian Boh 07S6G
7:36 AM   (1 comments)











April 2008
May 2008
Current Posts


- Rising Food Prices

- Benefits of Trade for Singapore

- The art of interpreting essay question requirements

- Deep Recession Fears Forced Fed to Cut Rates

- What Exams are all about

- Example of a video review

- Example of article review

- Post economic stuff and win GNA points



Images hosted by:


Powered by:
Powered by Blogger

Best viewed with 1024x768